|
There are two ways a pastor can fail the people in their care, and they look nothing like each other.
The first is the pastor who leads from the top down. This pastor has the vision, sets the pace, makes the calls, and expects the congregation to follow. There is energy here, and often real movement. But over time, people in this kind of church begin to feel like assets being deployed rather than souls being developed. The leader has direction but no tenderness. The flock moves, but not because they trust the shepherd. They move because they have learned not to argue. The second failure looks more spiritual on the surface. This is the pastor who has confused humility with passivity. This pastor defers to every opinion, avoids every hard conversation, and frames their reluctance to lead as a commitment to “letting the Holy Spirit move.” There is warmth here, and people feel heard. But nothing ever changes. The church drifts from one season to the next without direction, without challenge, without anyone willing to say, “This is where we are going, and we need to go there together.” Both of these are distortions. And both are common. The calling Jesus gives his leaders is more demanding than either of these, because it asks us to hold two roles at the same time, roles that pull in different directions, without collapsing into one at the expense of the other. The servant takes their place under the people. Jesus drew the picture plainly in Mark 10. The disciples were still sorting out who would be greatest in the Kingdom, and Jesus reframed the entire question. “Whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant…even as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” That is not a call to self-deprecation. It is a call to a particular kind of strength: the strength that lowers itself in order to lift others. Servant leadership is less about the lowering of the leader and more about the elevation of those being led. It looks like asking before telling. It looks like developing before deploying. It looks like staying genuinely curious about the people in your congregation, not as attendance numbers to grow or problems to manage, but as people made in the image of God, with stories and gifts and callings that deserve to be drawn out. A pastor with this posture asks the long-time member what they sense God doing in their life. They listen to the volunteer who is burning out before reassigning them. They take the time to understand why the family in the third row has been attending for two years and still doesn’t feel like they belong. The servant is present to people, not just the mission. And paradoxically, that presence is what creates the trust that makes the mission possible. The shepherd takes their place in front of the people. Peter’s instruction to the elders of the early church is equally direct: “Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them, not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock.” The shepherd leads. That is not optional. Shepherds move the flock toward water and away from danger. They seek the one who wanders. They call the congregation to movement when movement is required. They guard the flock against threats, including the threat of comfortable stagnation. A pastor who never takes a clear position is not practicing humility. They are abdicating responsibility. A church that has no one willing to name the vision, call out the hard truth, or challenge the congregation toward the harder and better thing is not a humble church. It is a leaderless one. And a leaderless church does not thrive. It drifts. The shepherd role requires the courage to lead, which means the courage to be misunderstood, to call the church forward when not everyone is ready, and to hold the vision steady when the pressure to return to what is comfortable becomes intense. Shepherds do not simply follow wherever the sheep want to go. The integration is the calling. Servant without shepherd becomes a passive people-pleaser who never moves anyone anywhere. Shepherd without servant becomes a domineering leader who moves people through force rather than through trust. But the pastor who holds both roles together, genuinely and not just rhetorically, creates something that neither role can produce on its own: a community that is both cared for and called forward. This is not a balancing act. It is not about being a servant on Tuesdays and a shepherd on Thursdays. It is about leading from a posture that asks before it tells, develops before it deploys, and then has the courage to say, “This is where we are going,” precisely because the people in that room already know they are loved. The most effective leaders I have encountered embody this integration. They are curious and caring with individuals, and courageous and clear with the congregation as a whole. They are not the same in every setting, but they are consistently themselves: servant and shepherd, all the way through. A question worth sitting with: Which side of this tension do you lean toward naturally? Most of us know the answer without much reflection. Some of us are natural servants who need to find our courage. Others are natural leaders who need to slow down and learn to listen. The growth edge is almost always on the side we have been avoiding. Leadership Challenge: This week, have one conversation with someone in your congregation that you approach entirely as a curious servant, no agenda, no outcome you are trying to produce, just genuine curiosity about who they are, what they carry, and what God is doing in their life. Ask. Listen. Stay longer than you planned to. Notice what you learn that you didn’t expect. Comments are closed.
|
Archives
May 2026
|
RSS Feed